During the Ryder Cup broadcasts a few weeks ago, there was ample mention
of the "mown rough or lack of rough”. Repeatedly, commentators referred to
the short rough. Apparently (according
to the announcers) this is a revolutionary concept! Why such
a big stink about mown roughs? It certainly wasn't radically innovative. Perhaps it was a revelation for the Tour –
which commonly features the trademark “fairway narrowing and deep rough”.It is sad this maintenance practice provoked such a commotion. It’s a revealing indication of professional golf’s apparent inability to embrace change, diversity and variety. Did the short rough really alter play that much? Why was the "closely mown rough" such a big deal?
![]() |
| A sampling of Medinah's greens.... |
The greenside bunkering is
impressive on this Tom Bendelow designed golf course. As these images reveal,
the greens are rife with cunningly handsome hazards.
Medinah's greenside bunkers don’t appear to be fortuitous “window dressing” either. The bunkers present as formidable sentries, defending the greens. So, it is unfortunate they did not feature in the strategy of the golf course - and influence play - during the Ryder Cup.
Tactical deprivation through excessive maintenance.
It's become an epidemic.
![]() |
| Another sampling of Medinah's greens |
Just my opinion….
*(Disclaimer: I must state openly that I have not played Medinah. So, you will understand the above comments are not based on my experience playing the golf course.)


No comments:
Post a Comment